New proposed federal boundaries released

A while ago I wrote a piece on the proposed federal boundaries, from the federal riding commission, for VUE weekly. The commission has released their most recent recommendations based on the town halls and public complaint period that was open in fall of 2012. These proposed boundaries will now go to parliamentary committee, and there are some significant changes from the original boundaries drawn that were presented to the public prior to open houses held across the country.

Noticeably, the Southern Alberta riding boundaries have shifted – keeping the proposed Lethbridge boundary to the city and the county, but grouping much of southern Alberta into the re-distributed Medicine Hat riding. This could be considered a win for the team of politically interested citizens and the Member of Parliament currently representing the Lethbridge riding who advocated for keeping Cardston and the Country of Warner in one riding to protect the cultural interets of that area, or “communities of interest”.

This scenario divides the region south of Lethbridge into separate ridings which I believe is not in our best interest.  It places both counties into remote, isolated corners of vast ridings, with which we have little in common and very few community ties. It also ignores the commission’s mandate to avoid splitting ‘communities of interest’ to the extent possible.

- From Jim Hillyer’s website.

It certainly will make the nominations for the Conservative candidate in both the Medicine Hat and the now much geographically smaller Lethbridge ridings rather interesting, perhaps leading to some hotly contested candidate contests.

The rest of Alberta also sees some changes with the new boundaries, and as Daveberta points out in his analysis of the proposed boundaries:

Also interesting to watch will be Calgary-Centre, where last year’s hotly-contested federal by-election drew national attention. Was the close race in Calgary-Centre the beginning of a new trend for that city or was it simply a mid-term anomaly?

These proposed boundaries have already been filed with the Speaker, and will now go to a Parliamentary Committee. Once in committee MPs may file written objections within 30 days of the report’s submission to committee – objections must be signed by a minimum of 10 MPs. Once the 30 day objection period has passed, the committee issues a report to the commission and in June of this year the final report will be submitted to the Speaker of the House. Public consultation for the proposed boundaries are now over, though MPs continue to be able to request changes/file complaints.

For an excellent analysis of the ridings and the proposed changes when it comes to party wins in those ridings check out Daveberta’s recent post, Alberta’s new federal ridings released.

Tagged , , , , ,

Gender and provincial leadership, cautious optimism.

Sandra Pupatello and Kathleen Wynne

Ontario Liberal party leadership candidates Sandra Pupatello (left) and Kathleen Wynne attend a forum in Toronto on Dec. 6, 2012. (Frank Gunn / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

I am very glad to see that many provincial parties are electing female leaders.

It is a proud thing for this young feminist to see our country welcome and accept women as party leaders, and as provincial leaders. Further, it is satisfying that these women are leading different parties, with differing values. That those who chose to do so, can (and will) point to this moment in time as an explicit example that politically driven  women are politically different just as they are personally different; that women are not politically driven by a single issue.

However, let us not forget that this hardly marks the end of sexism in Canada or elsewhere. Women are still valued less, economically, than men in almost every industry. Women are more likely the primary caregiver for children and the elderly but are not compensated for this work. “Women’s issues” are still deemed as such, and not person’s issues. I am indeed very proud to see strong women in power, and I very much hope these women inspire others to lead us towards a more equitable future.

Saying it even better than I:

“Symbolically it’s important for a time — what could be a very short time — that we have gender parity among the premiers,” said Jane Arscott, co-author of the upcoming book, “Stalled: The Representation of Women in Canadian Governments.”

“It would be more significant if the position could be consolidated with an electoral win.”

Women are still under-represented in the country’s legislatures, ranging from 10.5 per cent in the Northwest Territories to 30 per cent in Ontario — with Quebec having the highest representation at nearly 33 per cent.

The wave of female premiers is “marvellous,” but Canada saw this trend in the early 1990s before it dropped off, said Arscott.

Regardless of the outcome, women activists say the surge of female premiers in recent years is an “extremely auspicious moment” — the result of decades of work by other trailblazers.

“That doesn’t mean it’s the end of the story — absolutely not,” said Nancy Peckford, executive director of Equal Voice, an organization promoting the election of more women.

(Via CTV on the Ontario Liberal Leadership Convention)

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Repost: The Worst Day Of The Year, Every Year

A very brave post written by a very smart woman. Thank you Brittany for sharing your story.

The Worst Day Of The Year, Every Year.

So I ask that next time we see each other, please don’t treat me any differently than you would have yesterday. The sexual assault is something I’ll always carry with me, but I have a million great things going on in my life. And remember that I’m not the only woman you know who has been assaulted – you just may not know about it.

Reflecting on Kristof’s NYT piece: “Is Delhi So Different From Steubenville?”

I read, think and write about gender inequality often. For a while, it was my job to keep aware of news stories and opinion pieces on gender abuse and sexist behaviour. I just finished a research piece on the state of feminist discourse within International Relations. While I live in a fairly open, and much safer country than most – I continually see the unequal power distribution. Threats to bodily autonomy remain and pay inequity is still deeply entrenched in our corporate culture. Still, I am lucky, as are many of the women who live in Canada. 

This morning I read something that made me think more deeply on rape culture, and privilege, on a local level: Nicholas Kristof’s “Is Delhi So Different From Steubenville?”

Gender violence is one of the world’s most common human rights abuses. Women worldwide ages 15 through 44 are more likely to die or be maimed because of male violence than because of cancer, malaria, war and traffic accidents combined. The World Health Organization has found that domestic and sexual violence affects 30 to 60 percent of women in most countries.

Statistics are damning yes, but they only show a silver of the true problem. There are many pieces of literature that shock and awe with terrifying numbers. Here though, in this article, Kristof rightly places blame on leader’s failure to take strong stance against rape.

The United States could help change the way the world confronts these issues. On a remote crossing of the Nepal-India border, I once met an Indian police officer who said, a bit forlornly, that he was stationed there to look for terrorists and pirated movies. He wasn’t finding any, but India posted him there to show that it was serious about American concerns regarding terrorism and intellectual property. Meanwhile, that officer ignored the steady flow of teenage Nepali girls crossing in front of him on their way to Indian brothels, because modern slavery was not perceived as an American priority.

What happened in Delhi wasn’t surprising, nor is what happened in Steubenville. America saw how far a community will go to protect local heros at Penn State and sadly it is a reoccurring tragedy in Steubenville. Power and privilege being used to abuse those with less. Worldwide, rape is the greatest threat women face. Sexual abuse is common place in any country and we need leaders – leaders of any community, no matter how small, to be brave and to stand against rape.

It is hard to change a country’s mind and academic leaders like Cynthia Enloe, Chandra Mohanty, and Fred Halliday have written a great deal on gendered power imbalance and the dangerous culture it fosters for women locally and internationally. Fundamentally in Steubenville, in Delhi, and even here in Canada the power of women is centred in their bodily use. If a women puts down her drink, she was not being careful enough to not get date raped (as insinuated by a recent university campaign against alcohol abuse), if a woman wears a short skirt she is asking for aggressive attention, and if a woman goes to a party, drinks too much then she put herself at risk, and boys will be boys. 

There has been many successes in the feminist/equality movement. In my own communities I have seen outright sexist individuals change their tune completely. However, fundamentally, women are still treated with suspicion. Our bodies dictate our worth in many ways – beyond the superficial right down to the utility. The upsetting account of a ten year old girl exchanging oral sex for clean water as told in Kristof’s article and the all too common practise of sex slavery, or of being economically forced into the sex trade, demonstrate this.

I know there is no easy answer, but it is time leaders stand up and say the hard things. Convict rapists, stop victim blaming, educate men to NOT rape and stop placing the responsibility on women, and enact legislation policy/what ever that provides severe consequences for any abuse. 

Enough is Enough: Idle No More movement demands recognition and consultation for First Nations

front-idle-(supplieddec27-600x486

(Photo Courtesy of Tanya Eagle Speaker)

A movement started by a group of women in Saskatchewan who wanted to inform their aboriginal brothers and sisters of the consequences of Bill C-45—which they say is an attack on aboriginal land and water rights—has grown into a national call for action. Idle No More is rising among Canada’s Aboriginal Peoples and their supporters, from decades of lacking control and consultation over educational rights, land rights, treaty rights and the health and safety of First Nations people.

The movement has been taken on by hundreds of thousands nationwide in the forms of protests and campaigning over social media. Idle No More is a reaction to the lack of action taken to address the hundreds of missing and murdered aboriginal women, and the fact that aboriginal women are twice as likely to be violently murdered. It is a reaction to the Canadian government failing to provide documents obtained from church groups relating to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, and a failure to produce documents on residential schools from any other ministry outside of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development. It is not any one thing, but decades of outright ignoring of a specific group of people.

First Nations People are no longer willing to tolerate decisions made by the Canadian Government without consulting them, and both young adults and elders are forging a unified voice to inform the government they are not going to tolerate active ignorance.

Action was seen throughout the middle of December in the form of rallies, round dances, blockades, marches and flash mobs. December 21 saw a national and international day of peaceful action in Ottawa, Montréal, Toronto, Prince Albert, Winnipeg, Whitehorse, Denendeh, Edmonton, Calgary, Saskatoon, Sudbury, Sioux Lookout, Peace River, Prince George, Iqaluit, Owen Sounds, Vancouver, Victoria, Hamilton and many other cities across the country including small cities like Lethbridge and High Level, as well as towns that populate reservation territory like Standoff and Brocket in southern Alberta.

Idle No More grew because of a grassroots movement to communicate the needs of a people to the Canadian Government. While tribe councils have issued statements in support of Idle No More, it is their citizens that galvanized the official reaction. Myron Eagle Speaker, a recently elected councillor with the Blood Tribe Council in southern Alberta notes, “The Blood Tribe is going to take a stance against Bill C-45. We figure that with Facebook and Twitter, and if [reaction] was going to run rampant, we don’t want our people to get scared and start panicking, so we called for a teach-in and had a number of people come out.”

Eagle Speaker also noted that the grassroots nature of the campaign is critical and it is band council’s role to act in support. “We’re working side by side, recognizing them for their efforts organizing the peaceful protests and supporting others in different communities,” he says.

Social media platforms are being used to unify events across Canada, and spread information about the movement. It is also being used to put pressure on council governments to respond to the campaigns and protests, and to show action in solidarity with Idle No More. Eagle Speaker and other Blood Tribe Council members felt the need to put out a release in order to address some of the criticisms about the lack of action from elected members.

“We were the front runners in making that statement. Monitoring Twitter and Facebook, only now do I see other nations putting out statements as well,” says Eagle Speaker. “The government is saying they did consult, but the question has been asked if there were any consultations to let us see it in writing and none of that has come forth.”

As noted by Waubgeshig Rice, who is involved in Idle No More, it is this lack of consultation for years and unilateral action on behalf of the federal government that has pushed aboriginal people to the point where it is clear meetings and panel discussions with government officials have gone unheard. For many, Bill C-45 was simply the point where it became clear action was necessary.

In an open letter, the Assembly of First Nations Chief Shawn Atleo called upon the First Nations community to work together in solidarity, and for the Government of Canada to meet with the Assembly to resolve these issues. It is clear from all comments from aboriginal leaders that solidarity and unity is the first objective.

Idle No More is bringing people together. This is echoed in Chief Theresa Spence’s desire to see peaceful, unified action. In the Attawapiskat First Nation chief’s commitment to fast until Prime Minister Harper meets with her, she remains steadfast in calling for peace, though she does recognize that if her fasting leads to her death there will be a great deal of anger. She told news organizations, “If I die, things might get bad. Back home, there’s been talk of people shutting the mine down, there’s talk of roads being closed. We want peace, but we can’t control what happens if things get worse.”

Alberta has taken a leadership role in this movement, with members of bands throughout the province holding multiple rallies, teach-ins, round dances and road blockades. Both in southern and northern Alberta, where land loss and resource development have caused health concerns, water contamination and a loss of rights over traditional land, highway blockades are being used to get attention and demonstrate the urgency of these issues.

Grand Chief Charles Weasel Head issued a statement on behalf of the Assembly of Treaty Chiefs Executive of Treaties 6, 7 and 8: “We are in prayer and support of Chief Spence in her sacrifice to bring attention to the plight of First Nations in Canada and for the reconciliation of our inherent and treaty rights and title. We need to be meaningfully consulted and have free prior and informed consent on any legislation impacting First Nations. It’s so sad that Theresa feels she has to resort to this extreme measure to make this assertion, but that is why, more than ever, we must stand together in solidarity in order to move forward to ensure our rights are protected.”

The Blood Tribe made Harper an honorary Chief, giving him the name “Chief Speaker.” When his title was bestowed, Weasel Head commented it was because Harper, “Speaks as the chief. His words are words that come from his position.” For many Blood Tribe members, Harper’s decision to remain silent during Idle No More and his lack of communication with Spence has brought dishonour to this name and to the honour inherent in becoming an honorary chief.

Idle No More was galvanized by Bill C-45, but it doesn’t begin there or end there. It begins with a desire to see change and to simply be heard—to be acknowledged as a community of people who have autonomy—with rights that need to be respected.

Originally published December 22nd, 2012 in VUE Weekly Issue #897.

Review of Nadja’s new release: Dagdrøm

Nadja offers up a sludge-post-rock dreamscape

A perfect winter album, Dagdrøm is dark, ominous and fuzzy. Nadja releases a true to form ambient sludge-rock album as their first full length LP since the 2010  Autopergamene. Aidan Baker  and Leah Buckareff – originally from Toronto and now based in Berlin, combine talents with The Jesus Lizard’s Mac McNeilly. Dagdrøm features McNeilly to his full potential, easing away from the drum machine in favour of his well suited percussion styles.

Not unlike a long, cold walk in the late darkness of a January morning, Dagdrøm pushes the listener into it and encourages imagined dangers. The beauty of this fuzzy, drone esque sludge-rock album is the technicality and instrumentation, holding the listener spell bound. It moves through each track as if they are movements. The album itself is suspenseful. “One Sense Alone” is heavy, until those last few minutes when it softens and lulls you into a (false?) sense of security – the kind of security you imagine you might have after defeating some adrenaline causing spook . Only to know that it won’t be long before another one floats into your radar.

There is a lot of deep dark something-ness to Nadja usually, and the more structured nature of this release only amplifies that. You feel something is coming. It excites you as much as it concerns you. There is a somewhat dangerous feeling to Dagdrøm. Like when it is gets very cold and very dark all too early. The title track is a heavy mix of almost over bearing layers of noise and fuzz. “Space Time and Absence” finishes the album – a warm light after the long walk. Yellow and burning in a space not so distant.

Nadja makes sense for Berlin – or at least for the romanticized visuals of living in punk squats and writing drone-rock. Dagdrøm makes just as much sense for these dark Canadian winters. Where temperatures get equally unbearable and exhilarating. A really interesting album that rockets the listener away from those shiny summer tunes into a darkly beautiful reality.

Order it for yourself here.

Originally published on nmc.ca for New Release Tuesday on November 6, 2012. 

Calgary Artist in Residence collecting co-op stories

In honour of the United Nations International Year of the Co-op, and in partnership with Calgary 2012, Calgary based writer and musician Brian Brennan is the Artist in Residence (AiR) for the Southern Alberta Co-operative Housing Association.

To celebrate Calgary’s designation of being the 2012 Canadian Cultural Centre, artists from around were paired with various organizations in the city. Brennan was been paired with SACHA to capture stories about the experience of living in housing co-ops.

“I’ve been interviewing and doing Q and As with them (residents of co-op housing in Calgary). These interviews will be compiled and SACHA will be using the material and experiences — presenting the stories to the Cooperative Housing Federation of Canada (CHFC) for the annual general meeting that will be hosted in Calgary in 2013.

Brennan notes they aim to present the stories as a way, “to indicate to the delegates just how housing may differ from the way that is done elsewhere.”

Brennan hadn’t lived in co-op housing himself, “I didn’t know the first thing about co-op housing before I was assigned to SACHA, so it has been quite an eye opener actually.”

There are 16 Housing Co-Ops in Calgary, Alberta, boasting 1294 units collectively. The Southern Alberta Co-operative Housing Association (SACHA) manages and collectively organizes the housing co-ops available in southern Alberta. Outside of Calgary there are 28 units in Rocky Mountain House, 30 units in Lethbridge, 44 in Canmore, 24 in Red Deer, 62 in High River, and 24 units in Red Deer. SACHA is a regional organization connected to the provincial Alberta Community and Co-Operative Association (ACCA).

The Co-Operative Housing Federation of Canada explains, “because co‑ops charge their members only enough to cover costs, repairs, and reserves, they can offer housing that is much more affordable than average private sector rental costs.” One of the benefits of co-op housing is that, “living in housing that will stay affordable because it’s run on a non-profit basis and is never resold.”

While co-op living has a clear financial benefit, long time participants identify with the idea of community living. Residents have been open with Brennan about their experience, and their reasons for choosing this particular living environment. “I liked the idea of doing things with your neighbours, knowing who your neighbours are, sharing goals and aspirations,” explained one resident.

“Even though we live in a winter climate here in Calgary, outdoor space and the social dynamics that come out of it are really important,” described another resident. “I like to encourage co-op residents to embellish that and make it easy for people to get together in family groups by providing picnic tables and shared spaces. The spin off of that is the social glue of the place, so in the middle of winter, the warmth of those summer encounters are still there.”

Throughout this experience, Brennan sees how deeply entrenched the residents are within the model of housing co-ops. “My sense is that these are people that are so committed to co-op housing and that the only change they might make in their circumstances is they might look for different types of units geared towards seniors, or more housing that is more accessible. For the most part, they have lived in co-op housing for a big part of adult lives. They have raised their children, and they have grand children that come over to visit. They won’t be moving out into the suburbs.”

This was echoed time and time again, and one of the participants recalled moments from raising their children in this community centred, consensus based environment. “When they were children, because of our involvement in co-ops, our kids didn’t play school or store they played co-op meetings. They would write the agenda, pack up bags, go to meetings…”

The financial model of a housing co-op means that the co-op as a whole mortgages and manages the building, and each tenant pays rent toward the mortgage of the building. Most housing co-ops are not-for-profit, so the cost of rent is determined by the cost of the mortgage. Typically, this cost is much lower than the usual renter market in any given community as the goal is cost recovery and not profit. Housing co-ops are entering into a transition period.

“For many of the co-op housing groups, they are coming at the end of their mortgages period. They got very long mortgages, way back when in the 1970s. They had very long mortgage periods — some 35 to 40 years. Now they are coming to the end of that time, the end of the operating agreement. They will no longer have the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Association overseeing the activities. Once the mortgages are up, they will be on their own.”

In speaking with a resident they noted that, “we’ve been like teenagers living in the basement of our parents house — paying a little rent to mom and dad. Now they’re moving out and the whole place is ours and we get to make all the decisions and pay all the bills and are we prepared to be responsible for this multi-billion dollar enterprise?”

Co-ops are primarily governed through the board, elected by the membership as whole. Individual co-ops are run by adopted bylaws and policies that are then implemented and regulated through the co-op members. In Canada, co-ops are regulated through three means: The co-op act for their province or territory, the human rights legislation for their province or territory, and the principles of natural justice. As well, all co-ops must be first incorporated and are subject to those regulations as well. They are clearly defined housing entities and are subject to various obligations.

For Brennan, this experience “has been an interesting journey for me. Mostly because I entered into it not knowing much about co-op housing or community living. It was good to get a sense of why people choose that kind of living as opposed to the more conventional where they buy a single family residence in the suburbs. It has been an interesting voyage of discovery for me.”

Each province has a different system of co-operative housing, and the Artist in Residence project will provide first hand experiences to showcase the various aspects of co-op housing in our region.

Article originally published in Rabble.ca, November 2 2012. 

Tagged , , , ,

NDP News Release on XL Foods

 News release
For Immediate Release
October 10, 2012

 NDP LEADER BRIAN MASON JOINS UNION, CALLS FOR ACTION ON XL FOODS

BROOKS, AB— Today, Alberta NDP Leader Brian Mason continued to raise concerns over Premier Allison Redford’s handling of the E.coli crisis in the province.

 At a press conference in Brooks, Alberta, he joined both the United Food and Commercial Workers Canada (UFCW Local 401) President Doug O’Halloran, the union representing the workers at the Brooks, Alberta XL Food plant, and Gil McGowan, the President of the Alberta Federation of Labour.

 “Between March 2011 and March 2012 the total work force at CFIA [Canadian Food Inspection Agency] was cut from 7,544 to 7,291,” said Mason. “Then this past April, another 308 jobs were cut. The Federal government plans to cut an additional $56 million more from its budget between now and 2015. When will this government realize that these cuts end up hurting Alberta’s beef industry and those it employs?”

 Production at the XL plant has gone from 2,500 cattle a day in 2004 to over 4,000 today, resulting in an increase in processing speed at the plant. That’s equal to two million pounds of beef or 3,000 steaks a minute. Yet, there has been no increase in the number of inspectors over last 12 months to reflect the increased work load. Employees have raised concerns about the lack of proper training and the need for whistle-blower protection for those who raise concerns and complaints about the dangerous work situations on the plant floor.

“The NDP is still the only party demanding accountability and answers from Premier Redford,” said Mason. “She must take responsibility for not standing up to CFIA cuts that will hurt the Alberta beef industry, workers and Albertans’ confidence in supporting our farmers and processors.”
 -30-

 For more information, please contact:
 Olenka Toroshenko
 Communications Assistant
 780.644.8669 (o), 780.935.9242 (m)
 Alberta’s NDP Opposition
 #501 Legislature Annex, 9718-107 St, Edmonton, AB. T5K 1E4
 www.NDPopposition.ab.ca

Industrial meat production shortfalls are catching up to us

Getting this out of the way: I am a vegetarian that occasionally eats fish – a pescatarian if you will. When I hear of meat related disease outbreaks, I admittedly feel slightly vindicated for my lifestyle choices. Let’s be clear, I get absolutely no satisfaction when deaths are related to any food consumption – kinda goes against the principle of my choice and all. The below post comes out of years of interest in the industrial food complex and what pitfalls it presents. I also live in southern Alberta and am a born and raised Albertan. I know many people who depend on the livestock industry for their livelihoods. I am not opposed to people having jobs or even eating meat.

Moving on.

This on-going e coli contamination, a terrible incident that is causing severe damage and even death of persons across the country, does point to a larger issue that North Americans are facing with their concept of “food” that will only become more of an issue in the future.

Cargill Foods and XL Foods reportedly slaughter 90 per cent of Canada’s cattle. Alberta farmers and ranchers raise 40 per cent of Canada’s cattle, and more than 60 per cent of Canada’s cattle are slaughtered at XL Foods.  The particular packing plant in question here, located in Brooks, Alberta processes more than 48oo cattle daily.  In 1978, according to the National Farmers Union, there were 17 federal inspected beef packing plants in Alberta along. Presently there are only the two mentioned above.

Alberta has very strict laws regarding farm slaughter of farm raised animals. They simply do not allow it. Animals raised on farms and ranches are sent to a provincial, federal or EU approved facility – depending on where the meat is to be exported to.

There is a small and narrowly defined exception to this:

More often than not, farm raised animals are sent to large feed lots and then to industrial slaughter houses.

Today, highly specialized cattle feedlots feed most of the province’s cattle to market weight. Alberta’s natural resources and climate are especially suitable to the cattle feeding industry. There are now 4,000 feedlots in Alberta, making the province the fifth largest cattle feeding area in North America. Although feedlots can range in size from a capacity of few hundred head to almost 40,000 cattle at one time, the larger-sized feedlots now finish the majority of cattle in Alberta. About 100 feedlots with capacities over 1,000 head produce at least 75 per cent of the finished beef cattle in the province. (via Alberta Beef Producers)

Feedlots are industrial complexes that are prime breeding grounds for serious infections and the spread of disease. The negative components of feedlots are often outweighed for industry by the large amount of product that can be moved through to slaughterhouses that can continue to output enough beef, or what have you, to feed an insatiable appetite for meat.

In order to genuinely patrol a huge industry, there needs to be strict regulations that are upheld. There needs to be an inspection agency with the mandate and the ability to ensure complete compliance with food safety.

According to the CFIA’s plans and priorities report from May 2012, spending on food safety this year will be $340.3 million, falling slightly to $337.5 million by 2014-15. That’s less than was spent on food safety the year before the Harper Conservatives came to power ($341.5 million) and considerably less than the $379 million the CFIA spent on food safety in 2006-07, the Conservatives’ first full year in power. (From the CP)

With this serious outbreak, and significant economic impact, political positioning is at an all time high. This coming from a provincial government who once boasted a leader whose solution to the BSE crisis was to go back in time and have the farmer who reported an ill cow, “shoot, shovel, and shut up”.

Political leaders are not going quite so far this time around, but they are eager to blame every level or regulator but themselves.

When it comes down to it, industrial food output is complicated and dangerous. When feedlots create waste that leaks into ground water it affects the entire water system, putting increased pressure on our treatment centres. When our food is created through an industrial food industry, an industry that increasingly values production over quality,  it hurts consumers. We are disconnected from our food. We do not learn how animals are slaughtered and become juicy BBQ’ed steaks. We do not see the GMO production that goes into making tomatoes bigger. We choose to turn a blind eye, even as huge cattle trucks headed to whatever slaughterhouse pass us on the highway.

Farmers are going to feel the impact of this. The 2200 people XL foods employes in Brooks alone (one third who are Temporary Foreign Workers) will feel the impact of this. Their livelihoods are subject to this company getting up and running again. As a society, we have created a situation where there is no winning. Should the government pressure CFIA to reopen the plant the workers may have their jobs back and ranchers will be selling cattle again, but the issue of poor regulation remains.

Farmers are prevented from taking control over their own means of production. No longer can a farmer butcher their own livestock on site and sell to a local community. There are few opportunities, and often they come with a price, for people to know the person who raised and killed their dinner. This is supposedly due to safety, but I don’t see how that holds up when we have the international community recalling beef coming out of a certified and inspected plant.

Maybe it is time to look at a redesign of the system. Maybe it is time to look at our consumption. These are big questions, and media like Food, Inc and writers like Michael Pollan  articulate this much clearer and with greater detail. These are important questions. Not to be rushed, but to be considered each and every time we consume.

Our governments, CFIA and XL Foods need to own up to a fundamental truth: our current means of food production is not sustainable.

Review of Efterklang’s ‘Piramida’

For Those Who Like: Bon Iver, Radiohead, Fleet Foxes, Jens Lekman, Sufjan Stevens

There are certain times that a music lover will stumble onto something – something that is inconceivable to how it wasn’t found before. For those discovering Efterklang now on the arrival of their fourth album, Piramida, it is an experience not unlike having a word on the tip of your tongue for so long and finally knowing what it is. There is something thrilling here – accessible with enough finesse and modesty to keep each song playing all the way through.

The three Danes, now residing in Berlin, don’t usually perform alone and listening to Piramida there is a full sound only imaginable through a symphony of players, each sending a unique appreciation of their role. Efterklang continue with a dark sensibility on this album, taking their inspiration from nine days recording field sounds in an abandoned Russian mining town – the album now a namesake of the mining settlement.

The second track, “Apples”, carries away with heavy synths matched by electronic horns and string section all coming together in an incredible full song. The full use of percussion in a few of the tracks, as well as disarming Gregorian-like melodies, such as in “Told to be Fine” and “Black Summer” pulls together the sometimes ambiguous lyrics into a genuinely interesting and captivating experience.

Although Piramida may be reminiscent of the leisurely paced ethereal folk/pop/electro music that captured artists throughout 2011, Efterklang’s conceptual creation defines itself with a sincerity that is unmistakable. They do clearly fit in with their 4AD label counterparts, but there is a richness and genuine quality that brings about similar feelings only because there is a true craft being represented here.

The merging of digital and classical instrumentation reflects Mads Brauer, Casper Clausen and Rasmus Stolberg’s approach to art in general. Using not only Efterklang as a venue for musical expression, they also create short films, and the live debut of Piramida came with a performance in partnership with the Sydney Symphony Orchestra.

This post was originally published on the New Music Canada blog for New Release Tuesday, September 24th 2012.

Tagged , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,081 other followers

%d bloggers like this: