Tag Archives: alberta

Celebrating this decade: ten momentous occasions in University of Lethbridge history

This decade has seen some incredible and historic moments. The Y2K bug/anti climax of 2000, the threat to North American security on September 11th, 2001, the rise of the China’s international political and economic power, the fall of the American economic system, climate change as a ever growing concern, Canada’s lowest voter turnout in 2008, and the political polarization that has occurred in European and South American states.

Living through the events in this past decade, and reflecting on the effect these events have had causes me to pause and marvel at our ability to adapt to new and different surroundings. The world looks very different today than it did in 2000. Old threats have diminished and new ones have emerged. Technology has boldly re-invented itself, and the age of social communication through sites such as Twitter, and Facebook have allowed our personal and professional relationships to draw new boundaries and consider greater fluidity.

The fall of capitalism, the major natural disasters we have witnessed, and the changes in our political and societal landscape are no small thing. This decade has changed the way everyone views the world. When everything can be taken from you in an instance, through no control of your own, suddenly baubles mean less. It is the intangible values, and the moments of happiness that we remember when looking retrospectively, not shiny presents of things.

The University of Lethbridge has undergone some major changes, both physical and psychological. We have grown in prestige and strength as a suburb undergraduate institution, and have expanded our physical presence in the Southern Alberta community tremendously. UofL have expanded their graduate studies programs, more students are enrolling and graduating than ever before from both graduate and undergraduate programs, and UofL is attracting world renowned talent to bestow their knowledge to UofL students, who will one day go on to surpass even the greatest.

In honour of the passing of this glorious decade, a harking back to the years before when “Jenn’s Top Tens” graced these pages; I present a top ten of the most momentous occasions in University of Lethbridge history:

On-Campus Daycare Center (2005 – 2010)

After a long and arduous process of constantly lobbying the administration, the University of Lethbridge reinstated the on-campus day care, promising to have it built as soon as possible. Luckily, this coincided nicely with a boom in our provinces’ resources, and soon the day care plans were under way and a committee was struck to deal with the detailed execution of the building.

This would not have been possible without the persistence of many people, some who are still here to see the fruits of their labours, and some who have since moved on but are no doubt celebrating in spirit. 2005, a rally was held to show support for on-campus day care and those who spoke and attended remember it well. Dr. Harold Jansen of the Political Science department extols as a “Great example of solidarity between undergrad, grad students and faculty.” Together, the entire university came together to show the need for this service on-campus, and the will of the community to make it so.

Fortunate to be able to attend the ground breaking last March, a feeling of overwhelming pride in the community I belong to rose up in me. I am proud of the incredible individuals who attended countless board of governors meetings, who presented solid arguments and who proved to the whole community that there was a need and support for an on-campus childcare center. I am proud to attend a school with lead by members of administration who continue to work to see this plan executed and deliver the tangible outcome of so many people’s hard work.

The day care is set to open officially in January 2010.

Womens Rugby CIS Wins (2007, 2008, 2009)

Our womens rugby team took the CIS National Championships three consecutive years this decade with a lot of hard work and effort. They expended their top notch training with ease and grace and secured this national honour three consecutive years running, the 2nd team in history to earn that title; proving that the pronghorns are indeed the fastest and toughest animal in North America and the University of Lethbridge truly has an athletics programs to shout about. Two time CIS Champion Allie Laurent remembers it is a shining moment in her UofL career, “Winning the universities second CIS national championship since men’s hockey won in 1993 and after only having a women’s rugby team for 7 years…then winning the next two years in a row to start a pronghorn’s rugby dynasty”. This is a feeling every UofL member can hold dear, off and on the field.

Polaris Prize (2009)

They call Dr. Bruce McNaughton the “20 million dollar man” and his decisions to join the University of Lethbridge Neuroscience program, bringing his excellent expertise and experience was very much a win for this university. Of course, the experience and first class facility he gets here was a rather large incentive for him. The Canadian Center for Behavioral Neuroscience welcomed Dr. McNaughton officially in 2008, and celebrated the achievement of securing the AHFMR Polaris Award, a research grant worth $10 million over 10 years, matched by Alberta’s iCORE research grant, giving an addition $10 million over ten years. Dr. McNaughton will be working with University of Lethbridge students on brain behavior, incorporating UofL knowledge into this innovative and groundbreaking research.

WTF?!/First Choice Savings Center – 2006

Yes, not the most glorifying moment in history for either the University of Lethbridge or the University of Lethbridge Students’ Union. After the students passed a referendum to partially, but substantially, fund the new sports and recreation center, the university thought it was fit to allow them to name the building.

Then came the infamous title “Witness the Fitness” or, WTF. Thankfully, the university axed that in favour of naming it after the second largest donor, a bank. Yes, this was the best anyone could come up with, naming the new world-class fitness center either after a bank, or a colloquial term primarily used by 12-17 year olds.

Notwithstanding the naming fiasco, the fitness center has had a major flooding incident, and was partially shut down for a period.

However, overall, with the steam rooms, the rock climbing center and that very sexy track, our First Choice Savings Center – or as it is more commonly know, the PE building, is something to be inspired by. It has aided in attracting many community members from around Southern Alberta to use the facility and interact with the university.

Uleth goes to space (2004 – 2009)

Dr. David Naylor, an astronomy professor has lead a team of both graduate and undergraduate students at the University of Lethbridge to provide a major contribution in the form of the SPIRE instrument, which was used in the Herschel mission, launched May 14th 2009. The Herschel mission is a mission designed to gather information about the universe, the deepest and darkest parts of the universe.

The SPIRE instrument is an infrared camera and spectrometer that can simultaneously look at an entire region in the sky. The UofL delivered the test model and technology to the missions’ headquarters in the UK, and was used for the first time in 2004 to qualify the early version of SPIRE.

Take that NASA, we do not just blow up parts of satellites to see what is going on.

The (new) Library Building (2003)

The building of the new library building was a huge achievement for the University of Lethbridge and allowed not only our holdings to increase, but also future technological changes to be implemented and installed with greater ease. Our library building is fantastic for a school of our size and the decisions to place it in the center of campus completes the student hub between the Students’ Union building, the PE building, and the library.

A 6% increase for Alberta’s post-secondary institutions base operating grants (2004)

The Advanced Education and Technology ministry of the Alberta Government made an incredibly forward and progressive decision in the mid 2000’s. They boosted the yearly increase to post-secondary institutions to 6%, from the traditional increase of 4%. With Alberta rapidly growing economy, and increase in expenses 4% a year was below the Alberta price index inflation adjustments.

Without this extra grant, it is unlikely that the University of Lethbridge would have been able to provide the $600,000.00 in Quality Initiative Program funding, invest financially in the plethora of new buildings, or attract the talent and knowledgeable faculty  members was have taken in over the past 5 years. While the Alberta government has told Albertans that PSE is not a budgeting priority in the fiscal crisis, it is important o remind them of all the good that was done and the benefit it has to Alberta’s students and Alberta’s knowledge economy.

Former ULSU President, Kelly Kennedy comment on this, “When the province started to give post-secondary institutions a 6% increase to base operating grant funding. They normally were given 4% increases yearly, which was generally below API. I doubt QIP and other construction would have happened if it wasn’t for this increase.”

Markin Hall, Stadium, Canadian Center for Behavioral Neuroscience center (CCBN), Water Building, and Turcotte Hall (2000 – 2010)

This decade the UofL built, with assistance from the student population, the provincial, and the federal government, six new buildings and substantially upgraded Turcotte Hall to enlarge and increase the modernity of our campus. This is an incredible feat in ten years, and has no doubt added to the quality of education for every student at the UofL.

Notably, the student body has shouldered a significant amount of the cost of these new buildings.

Poo Day (2008)

Who could forget this incredible day? November 4th, 2008, I know where I was. Sitting in my VP Academics office, hearing commotion outside and then learning that sewage line broke and level one of the Students’ Union building, a building that deals with high foot traffic everyday, is flooded with…well, poo. As this was clearly a health hazard, and the sewage and water system for the entire university had to be turned off to fix the broken line, every single person got the day off from all classes and mid-terms. Hence the affectionate given to this day by at Uleth’er: “Poo Day”.

Dr. Bill Cade, our illustrious leader for this decade.

The University of Lethbridge has been lead admirably by this President for the past decade; and under his leadership the University has lead the field in water and neuroscience research, expanded Liberal Education programming, increased the visibility of the Edmonton and Calgary campus’, and continued to display itself as a strong undergraduate university focused on graduating insightful and critical thinkers. As Dr. Cade is stepping down from the Presidency after this academic year, our institution owes a great deal of gratitude to the passion he has exhibited for the UofL. His Texas drawl, his office Chameleon, his obsession with crickets all give him the personality I think we will miss.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ChangeCamp: a better plan…

It has been more than a month since ChangeCamp Edmonton, and since then, I have has ample time to reflect on ChangeCamp and why I choose to participate.

As a student, my life moves from one deadline to the next. Self absorbed out of necessity, I often lament the time constraints which excludes me from many of the social and community activities that happen around Alberta. I am fortunate in that my (amateur?) professions throughout last three years have allowed me to make community work a priority, but as my last year in my undergraduate degree slips through my fingers, I now am forced with that all important question.

What the hell should I going to do now?

I know I love political engagement, and I love media. To an obsessive level. To prove: I am in the midst of writing a paper on social media’s impact on political engagement, #nerdfest, amirite?

The biggest challenge I see is connectedness. Society has embraced social media in the mainstream consciousness. Facebook is used as a marketing/advertising tool, and press releases are disguised as personalized message. Twitter is used by a demographic which had yet to be tapped into, the educated well established professional. Blogs are widely read, and they are able to capture the collective consciences in a way that mainstream media has failed to do in the last five or so years.

ChangeCamp first captured my attention with its broad appeal. Completely format free, yet structured enough to be conducive to open and somewhat organized discussion. What impressed me especially was the quality of the discussion, the willingness of individuals to bring forth opinions and the openness with which they were received.

I am fortunate to be well acquainted with a few of the organizers and the level of commitment and the amount of effort being poured into this event impressed me. I wanted to be part of this movement, to be a member of this Alberta wide community, active in promoting a change,  a re-visioning of our current societal norms and processes.

In any city, ChangeCamo gives any citizen who has the cahones the chance to come forward and propose a topic, question a pre-existing norm, and offer a collective solution.

Recently, I have felt delighted and overwhelmed with the different paths in front of me to engage the democratic process in Alberta. Resistance Alberta, this blog, Twitter engagement, and the many circles of friends who see a need for a change in Alberta, and in our own communities.

Democratic engagement is not really Alberta’s strong suit any longer. Everyone has an opinion on something here, and a way to do it better, especially government spending and regulations; but all too often we allow ourselves to be placated by the lack of efficacy and empowerment many rural and isolated communities feel.

What does it matter to be progressive, if being progressive leaves you out of the process?

This is why I went to ChangeCamp. To meet these people, to interact with the same bloggers who I have followed to gain insight on such activities as Bill 44, Resistance Alberta, and the Alberta’s governing party, and the minutia which really does mean so much when put into context. Writers and analysts I have come to admire because of their willingness to criticize the status quo, while offering citizen based solutions.

Four others from Lethbridge accompanied me, and our discussion afterward revolved around the same basic issue we all had. How does this level of open discussion spread beyond the activist capitol who attend such events? How do we, or I, take everything heard and discussed here past this room.

Southern Alberta can often feel disengaged from the rest of Alberta. From the many involved tweeps I connect with, I hear of meetings carried out to continue the change they felt was needed. Whether it be open access, direct engagement with our representatives, or even a challenge to the current Albertan democratic process it seems that there are things happening, but they are very much centered in Alberta’s captiol city.

Stillthough, this gives me heart, but I wonder how this level of activism can be disseminated through the rest of Alberta. ChangeCamp should be more than just one day in one city center, it should reach out to inspire everyone to change what they can in their own communities. Be it the music scene in a smaller center, the way you connect with your political representative, or bigger changes such as running to be a representative yourself.

To enter into the system, the challenges are there and they are fierce. Compromise is necessary, but many of the individuals who take that opportunity to act as a community leader have been truly exemplary in leading through example and initiating progress. There were several political representatives participating in the ChangeCamp event, from multiple levels of governing and it was fantastic to be able to address them as people, not as politicians. Just as another person who is interested in something more, finding the common ground of active community involvement.

While my change may be as simple as inviting four others to be a part of this community, I know that it will ripple out. ChangeCamp should not start and stop with me or with anyone else.

I hope to hold a ChangeCamp event in Southern Alberta in early 2010. I hope to see people affected by this idea, and bring forward their own ideas for progress, and address the challenges they see and face.

One person can accomplish a great deal when they allow themselves to be heard, one community can accomplish even more when we allow ourselves to listen.

Tagged , , , , ,

Marriage in Canada: an equal opportunity institution?

ssmarriageThe institution of marriage has long been a cultural and religious staple to celebrate both the union of two people, and the union of two families. Though public perceptions may have changed, marriage is still a way to ensure financial stability, successful reproduction, and a successful translation of cultural norms to future generations. Despite these favourable aspects, marriage has also allowed for the patriarchy to continue; privileging men as being the rightful and dominant member of the union, and denying women control over their own choices, at least for the great majority of history.

Sadly, and demonstrably, marriage has not been an equal opportunity institution for anyone outside of a patriarchal, hetero-normative relationship. It has institutionally subjugated women for most of its history, and has been exclusive to those who place religious values over civic values.

However, as our culture changes and adapts to an emphasis on inclusivity for all people within our nation’s borders, the institution of marriage is being called into question, with the principles of marriage coming up, and coming out. The basic principles of ‘marriage’ are simple a union of two people for mutual gain. Whether it be sexual, financial, reproductive, love, or partnership, that draws two people together, marriage is not defined by the genders of those partaking. Heterosexual couples adopt as often as same-sex couples do. Foster homes are far too prevalent in our society, and couples taking in five, six children at a time cannot provide as safe an environment as a loving – and, yes, even gay, – couple could.

The recent success of proposition no.1 in Maine, and the less recent but still poignant success of proposition no.8 in California, held congruently with the 2008 Presidential election period have caused activist groups and individuals both south and north of the 49th parallel great remorse. However, it is not just our southern brother exemplifying backward and stagnate cultural behavior. Canada herself still struggles to prove to our European cousins that not everywhere in this hemisphere is a legislative wasteland.

It is often said that Canadians define our identity in non-Americanisms. We are decidedly and proudly ‘not American’. We eat different food, we elect Liberals, not Democrats, we take a less abrasive stance on patriotism, and of course, we have public health care. While all of these have special Canadian exceptions – Twinkies, Ignatieff, Afghanistan, the recently passed Healthcare Bill – Canadians embrace cultural fluidity, far outstripping America in this regard.

Policy and legislative changes in Canada are subject to strong regional influences. That said, as a federation, there is still a strong nation wide acceptance of certain things and federal regulations that ensure certain prescriptive freedoms. Marijuana smoking is widely accepted and indulged in, Tim Horton’s and Robin’s Donuts are rural staples, and marriage in Canada is officially an equal opportunity institution.

On July 20th, 2005, Canada became the fourth country in the world, and the first country on this half of the globe to recognize the concept of ‘Civil Unions’, allowing same-sex couples the right to be recognized under the law as a unified couple, complete with the right of property sharing, inheritance, and divorce proceedings. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the constitutional rights of same-sex marriages to be recognized as marriages and over the next three years, legal and political challenges to the institutionalization of same-sex unions in Canada have time and again been defeated by three consecutive federal governments.

Most provinces were supportive of this decision, submitting themselves willingly to the federal jurisdiction to which they belonged. To no one’s surprise, there was one province and one very ‘popular’ (or at least ‘populist’) leader who not only refused to support same-sex marriage but also called for a nation wide referendum. The very concept of a nation-wide referendum to settle a political and ideological dispute, which has entrenched and rather well-worded support within the Canadian Constitution and section two of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, signals a backward worldview that goes against our best principles as Canadians.

The oh-so clearly policy wise, and intellectual leader spoken of above was none other than King Ralph himself. Our former Premier did his very best to frighten Albertans, creating an environment where same-sex marriage was equated to polygamy, bestiality, and numerous other extrapolations which secreted less common sense than Glenn Beck.

Perhaps former Prime Minister Paul Martin said it most eloquently in a speech supporting same-sex marriage to the House of Commons in 2005, telling parliamentarians: “We would risk becoming a country in which the defense of rights is weighed, calculated, and debated based on electoral or other considerations. That would set us back decades as a nation. It would be wrong for the minorities of this country, it would be wrong for Canada.” Celebrating ignorance and fear is far from the Canadian ideal, and although I am not an American, I presume many Americans feel similarly.

The LGBT communities in both these countries are strong, and proud. The community and on-campus organizations that exist in many urban and even rural areas educate their communities and themselves on the ongoing challenges to acceptance people face due to their sexuality and their lifestyle.

Albertans on the whole are a fairly tolerant and just people. Our provincial culture was founded on a spirit of adventure, of breaking barriers, and demanding recognition. While these Northwest Territories were once wild land, settlers came to build homes and communities and create a safe environment for the future generations to grow up in.

Is this the environment we want our children to be subject too? The success of both Proposition 1 in Maine, and Proposition 8 in California speaks to several faults in the mindset of policy makers in America, but also speaks to a fear of change by the public that voted. Recognizing the right of same-sex marriage by no means lowers the value of a heterosexual marriage license. It does nothing to the religious values that shroud marriages of faith, as they have their own rules of engagement.

Sadly, Alberta has seemed to have progressed little in the last half decade. Our legislative assembly still seems to believe that the hearts and minds of Albertans are stuck in an archaic and ignorant stronghold of beliefs. How else does one explain the passing of Bill 44, a bill that simultaneously upholds sexual orientation hate crimes as a violation of human rights – as the Supreme Court ruled ELEVEN YEARS AGO – while disallowing sexual orientation, or sexuality as a whole to be taught, discussed, entertained, or even questioned in Alberta’s education system.

Teachers now have to write out their curriculums, explicitly defining when and how they plan to approach the topic of sexuality within any subject. Biology, English, Social Studies, and yes, Sexual Education will now be under close eyes of a few hard line parents, who now have the right to drag a teacher before the Human Rights Commission for entertaining the thought experiment that children might be curious.

Alberta is still a province when the GBLT community faces violent action against them, where law enforcement do little to ensure future safety, and where respected members of academic communities face a genuine threat to their family’s safety. It is every persons responsibility to communicate to our legislative members, our representatives, those who are supposed to reflect the true hearts and minds of Albertans, that we as a province are open minded, we respect equality, and that we believe marriage should be an equal opportunity institution. For better or for worse.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Our Truth and Effort

My first stab at The Meliorist’s opinion piece:

Political change in Alberta tends to reflect the open expanse of land and the spread too thin homesteads that dominate our prairie province. Pockets of individuals alienated and disaffected by the central government, afraid the brave the harsh climate they perceive. Coupled with groups of elites, people in small and shaky compartments, lifted away from the groundswell, and isolated from each other.

These past six months have seen the political landscape in Alberta shift. It may be small and it may be that only the most hard core of political pundits have followed the minutia of our political landscape, but this shift is cataclysmic in terms of Alberta politics.

With another provincial election still three years away, voters are already questioning what their elected officials are doing to reflect their voice, in the legislature and in policy decisions. Albertan’s expressing dissidence have evolved past letter writing and direct engagement with MLA’s through town halls and the like. The calls for change are progressively more vocal and more public.

Pieces of legislation, such as Bill 44, are debated in the streets, in cafés, on Twitter, blogs, and through mainstream media. Daily newspapers now have blogging added to their web content to allow their journalists to be ever more present in Alberta and ever more relevant, and these journalists are using that to express and reflect Albertan’s dissatisfaction with their governments.

The Wildrose Alliance Party, a party that few Albertans took note of a mere 4 months ago, now has over 11 000 members, a seat in the Legislature, and more media coverage for their leadership convention than the opposition parties could muster for town hall on health care.

The visible advantage the WAP has gained is in large part due to their vocal criticisms of the Stelmach-led government. While the current opposition seems content to rest on their laurels and travel the province speaking to small groups of disenchanted Albertan’s, the WAP was aggregating legions of Albertan’s frustrated with the lack of responsiveness by their MLA’s and channeling that desire to “send Ed a message.” The Glenmore by-election win was the first public clue that we are indeed in the midst of a fundamental shift in the way Albertan’s are participating in their provincial democracy.

Progressives are seeing this, and noting the advantage it presents. Split the right to strengthen the left is a historically oft-used tactic, though in Alberta, changes in government rarely go left but they do always go big.

Events like ChangeCamp, and other grassroots movements do what the WAP has done already. They bring people together and work to unite them around a common cause. For the WAP it was to “send Ed a message”, which its new leader, Danielle Smith, seems to have taken up as her personal war cry. For the progressives, the rallying cry seems still unclear.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

In brief

In April of 2009, the Government of Alberta brought down and voted in the budget for the upcoming fiscal year, projecting a $4.7 billion dollar deficit. This included a $2 billion promise to invest in Carbon Capture and Storage (a subject I have discussed at length on this blog).

In June of 2009 the Alberta Finance Minister asked Alberta’s public sector to just find $4 billion to cut somehow from somewhere.  ‘Just let the Government know when you have figured it out’ kind of thing.

In July of 2009 Premier Ed Stelmach announced the retraction of the alcohol tax in Alberta and made a public and decisive promise to not raise current taxes or levy new ones.

In August of 2009, first quarter results looks like an announcement to the tune of a $6 – $8 billion deficit. This comes alongside a curious lack of Stelmach presence in Alberta. This also comes along side the decisions mentioned above in relation of Alberta’s financial path.

My concerns are not with a provincial deficit. We are not protected against the rest of the world, which should resonate quite strongly since our major source of revenue is a world commodity and we trade globally ( or at the very least, trade to America which seems to think they are the globe…). My concerns are, that when this happened to Alberta in the early/mid nineties we reacted strongly and quickly and cut services across the board to every sector publicly administered in Alberta.

It paid off the debt yes, but look how far that has gotten us.

Tagged , , , , ,

Oil baths, for everyone!

The Alberta Government announced yesterday that they would be now encouraging companies that work to extract bitumen from Northern Alberta’s “Energy Beaches” to pay their royalty fee’s in kind, as in physical barrels of oil.

This is then to be used to sell to new, Alberta owned and operated refineries which will turn that black sludge into black oil…. and then realistically ship it to the United States for their use.

A Globe and Mail article  stated “..it began a process that, by 2012, will see it sell up to 75,000 barrels a day of that bitumen to a provincial firm for upgrading.”

It seems the new royalty scheme will only apply to certain companies, companies like Encana which do not own and operate their own in-province refinery.

Excellent news for the recently announced Premier’s Council for Economic Strategy, who can now cross the first to-do item off their list.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Let the voters decide…

The old saying “We got the Government we deserve” has been bandied around so often these last few weeks that seeing this underground movement has me believing more strongly in democratic change in Alberta. Never too early to start a pro-voter campaign.

* As informed by @michaeljanz and @brycedudley

Tagged , , , ,

The needle and the damage done…

Last night, the third reading of Bill 44, proposed amendments to the Human Rights Act in Alberta, passed 35 votes to 7 against in a “free vote”.

The conversation last night over Twitter and Facebook was lively and engaging, with private citizens, on both sides of the spectrum and the issue, discussing the implications this has on our province and verbally expressing their political wishes to their elected representatives. Many excellent points were raised, both for and against but with a clear majority of people, highly educated people (despite Min. Blackett’s perceptions) rallying against this Bill and against the principle of school room censure. Besides just the fast paced world of electronic discussion, letters and petitions were tabled in the house yesterday before the vote got underway, all from clearly concerned citizens (myself and @davecournoyer included) by various members of the legislature, notably Laurie Blakeman who tabled 84 separate letters against Bill 44.

Alas, it seems that it was not enough to sway those 35 members of the legislative assembly who blindly toed the party line and voted in favor of this highly unpopular bill.

Although I am clearly against the principle of Bill 44 and believe it to be bad legislation, I am more appalled at the lack of consideration members took to their electorates thoughts and desires.

To the members of the legislative assembly, please take heed. “There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than you have dreamt of in your philosophy”.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

My letter to my MLA re: Bill 44

Below is my letter recently sent to my MLA for Lethbridge West, Minister Greg Weadick and Minister Lindsay Blackett and Hon. Premier Ed Stelmach.

Minister G. Weadick,

I am writing this letter to express my concern over Bill 44, the proposed amendments to the Human Rights Act of Alberta. My concern lies with a specific section of Bill 44 as well as the overall intent and message of this Bill.

I would like to start by commending the Alberta Government for legislating sexual orientation rights within our Human Rights Act and I do see it as a substantial step forward in the right direction. This is an overdue response to the Supreme Court decision and reflects the values within Alberta’s diverse and inclusive culture.

There are several key reasons why, as a citizen of Alberta, I do not support this bill in its current format and urge you to exercise your free vote in this matter to vote against Bill 44 in its current state and work towards amending it to reflect the original intent of the change.

As a citizen of Alberta and a rather recent graduate of the Alberta Catholic School system, I see this as weak and redundant legislation, included to serve as a political statement regarding Alberta’s attitude towards ‘progressive cultural change’ but not a change in the way the Alberta School System operates.

Firstly, the inclusion of sexual orientation protection explicitly in the Alberta Human Rights Act is a reflection of a Supreme Court of Canada decision made eleven years ago. This inclusion, while in name is fundamental to reflecting the diverse and progressive culture within Alberta, does not significantly change the legal rights of same sex couples in Alberta. However, piggy backed on this inclusion is the enshrined right for parents to pick and chose the education their child receives through Alberta schools. The notable phrasing that allows parents to pull their children out of any education program, which threatens their religious beliefs, including mentions of sexual orientation in sexual education is a clear statement of the lack of belief that Alberta Government has in protecting and accepting the right of Albertan’s to exercise the sexual orientation of their choice. This is a significant cultural statement, one that has been picked up on by international and national media and quickly becoming an embarrassment and poor reflection of Alberta and people within.

Secondly, this legislation is entirely redundant, which has me wondering why the elected Government of Alberta is so interested in pursuing this bill, despite the vocal and populist opposition to it. As the people of Alberta, outside the Progressive Conservative caucus, do not look to be actively supporting this bill, it seems antithetical for the Alberta Government to insist on passing a bill with the purpose to “protect rights” already protected, and in a section of legislation which does very little in terms of change and progression.

While this bill only reflects the current rights of parents as enshrined within the School Act, it does perpetuate the negative stereotype of Alberta housing narrow-minded culture. Section Three of the Alberta School Act reads:  “All education programs offered and instructional materials used in schools must reflect the diverse nature and heritage of society in Alberta, promote understanding and respect for others and honour and respect the common values and beliefs of Albertans. For greater certainty, education programs and instructional materials referred to in subsection (1) must not promote or foster doctrines of racial or ethnic superiority or persecution, religious intolerance or persecution, social change through violent action or disobedience of laws.”

Notably, the principle of the statement is that the curriculum is to reflect the “diverse nature and heritage of society in Alberta, promote understanding and respect for others….” Parent’s already have the right to take their children from classes that they feel are inappropriate or explicitly go against their religious beliefs, and as you represent Lethbridge, a city which has a significant religious class, one that is diverse in its beliefs but similar in its faithful nature, this is a right exercised often. It is clear that parents are well aware of ability and their right to direct the nature of education their child receives. The inclusion of this right within the Human Rights Act only serves to reflect a negative and perpetuated culture of ignorance and exclusion, but gives nothing to parents that they do not already have. Indeed, it seems this Bill serves to regulate teachers and the school system further and allow less freedom of education, here in a province whose slogan is “Freedom to create, Spirit to achieve”.

Lastly, I am taken aback by the lack of consultation about this amendment, especially as many groups have come forward with strong opinions and those opinions do not seem to be taken into account. There has been a great deal of public discussion on this topic, free forums such as public media (newspapers, notably The Edmonton Journal) and web media such as blogs, twitter and Facebook have all hosted discussions on Bill 44 open to any and all. I personally have participated in several of these discussions and have been vocal about my personal opposition to Bill 44 and appreciate the level of engagement several of your caucus members have participated in.

I understand the third reading of Bill 44 will be happening this evening and I sincerely hope you take this letter into consideration when choosing your vote in this matter. I would be happy to engage you and any other elected member of the Legislature in this matter further and can be reached via e-mail at jenn.prosser@gmail.com. I have cc’ed both Min. L. Blackett and Hon. Premier E. Stelmach on this letter to express my concerns to a broad membership of the Progressive Conservative caucus. Thank you for your time and I look forward to a response.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Prosser

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Still that old Groucho Marx joke…

I tend to let myself live in a isolated community where Question Period is a common topic of conversation and policy amendments are debated on the level of “sexiness” the issue has potential to become. In that world, it is an easy belief that everyone is interested in political games, in outcomes, in process.

Although I can see through the crack in the door to where the outside world begins, I often chose to believe that their light is as bright as mine and that we cannot be alone in outrage and interest. Sometimes I am grossly disappointed, but sometimes I am blinded with surprise.

Bill 44. Many people *much brighter and more insightful then myself have written thoughts and potential consequences on the recently proposed amendment to the Human Rights Commission by the Alberta Government.

While I do strongly believe (and have been vocal about in other venues) that there is much to be concerned about with this amendment; such as the confusion within PC’s own caucus on how the amendment can be interpreted within the current Alberta curriculum, questions on individual school boards autonomy within notification of parents, the lack of support from the ATA and lastly, the underlying motivation for this less then popular amendment.

There are many people entering the discussion of this particular amendment. Not just people in the proverbial ‘circle’, but people who have little or nothing to gain themselves. People who don’t use, need, or care about political capitol, people who are for the most part left out of the decision making process.

Twitterverse has been active on this issue, with private citizens engaging MLA’s       (noticeably Lindsay Blackett and Dave Hancock themselves engaging back), bloggers being incredibly active in updating the public sphere on new ideas  (ie. daveberta) and discussion points and Facebook notes and groups springing up on a daily basis.

In all the blogs, in all the tweets, in all the bar room discussions I have had regarding political events I have been struck suddenly, taken aback and set to pause, truly appreciating what public engagement really is.

A anti Bill 44 Facebook group stopped me dead in my tracks. Using the same arguments that many others have, there is no radical reform ideas which caused me to pay attention. What caused me to pause and too appreciate is that this group was created by a student, a high school student, a high school student from my High School Alma Mater in fact. Declaring their indignation at a very certain and very distinct piece of legislation. With a mere 205 members (at this evenings count) this group is small in the social networking scheme but the discussion wall is active and there is real discourse there. Void of the usual political rhetoric and with no QP style name calling, this is what public engagement aspires to be.

Social media, with its networking sites and lists of interests you fill out to attract like minded people, can be good. Facebook reinvented the way marketers look at advertising, it stimulated the growth of the worst industry known to man, “cool hunters” and it suddenly did what forums and chat sites have been desiring to do for oh-so long. It created acceptable and use able web space. Regardless of the social site used, each and every one exists as firmly as any idea or thought or spoken sentence can.

This is the conversation needed to be brought in to truly understand where any community is on issues. Lets stop relaying on the tried and true methods, because they have been tried but are no longer true.

When Blackett tweeted “LindsayBlackett wants Albertans to know that their arte 30,000 inquiriese to the Human Right Commission each year and 900 are deemed to have merit.” this evening at app. 10:20 this evening, he was speaking to the people and likely he was responding to a the earlier tweets today about Bill 44. He was using twitter as a legitimate form of political discussion and policy process.

Despite the ban on twitter use in the house during QP by our long standing Speaker, this medium is being used to influence decisions, or at the very least openly question them.

Not to endorse cyber communication as the be all and end all of our public debate, but let us not close the door to it. All too many of the influential decision makers still scoff at these communication methods, and in their caged thinking they lose what they have been looking for.

Want youth to participate? Well, they are. Demanding that anyone participate on your playing Field only is not representation in any sense, it is arrogance and it is a sure sign of blind folded defeat.


*There are many who have provided me with much to think on in regards to this bill, notably Ken Chapman and Paula Simons.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,166 other followers

%d bloggers like this: